Effects of floral resource timing on neonicotinoid resilience in bumblebees
Bumblebee nutritional niches and floral preference in urban settings
See below for more details on my dissertation research
Above: Neonicotinoid diagram from Rodríguez‐Hernández et al. 2023.
Neonicotinoids are a class of insecticide that is widely used across the United States. The three most common neonicotinoids in the United States are clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam. Commonly applied as a seed coat, neonicotinoids are water-soluble, meaning they can easily travel through soil and plant tissue, including nectar and pollen. Neonicotinoids persist long after their first application, commonly being detected months to years afterwards. Neonicotinoids target and compromise the nervous system of insects, posing a huge threat to our native pollinators. In bumblebees, neonicotinoids have been shown to cause decreased foraging activity, impaired learning behavior, decreased brood care, lethargy, and ultimately death. For this reason, it is vital to understand how we can better protect our native pollinators, such as bumblebees, from neonicotinoid exposure.
Pollinator populations are declining globally due to multiple interacting stressors, including poor nutrition, pesticide exposure, habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and emerging pathogens and parasites. These stressors may act synergistically, producing combined effects more harmful than each alone. Despite growing concern, few studies have examined how poor nutrition and pesticide exposure interact to affect bumblebee health. Understanding how the timing of floral resource abundance shapes resilience to chemical stressors is critical for supporting pollinator populations in increasingly disturbed and agricultural landscapes. My research investigates the interactive effects of diet and chronic pesticide exposure on bumblebee health and detoxification responses. This work seeks to identify nutritional strategies to enhance pesticide resilience and inform pollinator-focused restoration efforts in post-agricultural landscapes.
A Bombus nevadensis queen foraging on Astragalus spp. (milkvetch).
A Bombus huntii foraging on Astragalus spp. (milkvetch).
Above: A look inside the rearing room! Bumblebee colonies have to be reared in the dark under very specific conditions. I've spent quite a bit of time in this room!
In the summer and fall of 2025, I reared colonies produced from wild-caught bumblebee queens in a laboratory setting as well as commercially ordered bumblebee colonies of the common eastern bumblebee (Bombus impatiens)! From these B. impatiens colonies, I produced microcolonies to address my research questions. A bumblebee microcolony is formed when five workers from the same natal colony are placed together. In the absence of a queen, one of the workers will essentially become a "pseudoqueen", develop her ovaries, and begin laying eggs. Since bumblebees have a haplodiploidy sex determination (i.e. fertilized eggs become females, unfertilized eggs become males), microcolonies can only produce drones (male bumblebees). Microcolonies, of course with limitations, can serve as a proxy for how bumblebees may respond to different conditions in a controlled laboratory environment.
Chapter II: Bee nutrition and selection indices
Bee nutrition is complex. Bees require macronutrients (such as proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) and micronutrients (such as vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, and phytosterols). Different bee species require different amounts of nutrients, and this nutrition will change through time. Castes will also forage differently due to morphological differences (e.g. queens have longer tongues than workers) and nutritional preferences and needs. Flowering plant species also provide different nutritional compositions from eachother. Laboratory assays allow for the quantification of macronutrition and micronutrition in pollen and nectar, and many studies focus nutritional responses to center on bee-collected protein-to-lipid (P:L) ratios.
Selection indices are used to evaluate how animals or organisms choose specific habitats or resources relative to what is available in their environment. These indices can be applied using plant-pollinator interaction data and can quantify bee floral preference, controlling for abundance. (In other words: If the abundance of flower species in a field were all the same, what would be the likelihood that a given bee species would visit a given flower?).
Figure 1 from Vaudo et al., 2024
Conceptual framework for considering bee nutritional niches and pollen foraging behavior. Plants’ positions in space represent their pollen protein and lipid concentrations and lines connecting them to the origin represent their protein:lipid (P:L) ratios. Target symbols represent hypothetical nutritional intake targets for different bee species. If groups of bees occupy similar targets, these may be considered nutritional niches. Direction and color of arrows illustrate how bees might use different foraging strategies while sharing similar resources to balance their diet to reach different nutritional intake targets: 1) foraging from a single plant species offering rewards close to the intake target, 2) foraging equally from nutritionally complementary resources close to an intake target, 3) foraging among all plants in the nutritional landscape at varying frequencies to balance their diet to reach a target.
Home gardens can provide high amounts of diverse floral resources for bees. Pictured above is a photo of one of my urban research sites.
Thistles galore! Many natural areas around Fort Collins have high thistle abundance later in the summer. Pictured above is one of my many urban research sites.
Chapter II: Understanding bumblebee nutrition in urban settings
Food is the foundation of ecological interactions, and the selection and utilization of nutritional resources is an essential topic to understand the ecology of a given organism. Bees are obligate consumers of pollen and nectar, and they make distinct, discriminating choices when foraging. Urban landscapes commonly provide floral resources for bees in the form of home gardens, school plantings, parks, community gardens, and other gardening initiatives. However, understanding how bees interact with these plantings is region- and species-specific, as different urban landscapes will have different floral assemblages and bee communities. Within urban settings, my research investigates how common bumblebee species in the Front Range of Colorado acquire nutrition and quantifies their floral preference. This research seeks to characterize species-specific nutritional niches and quantify floral preference to inform conservation plantings tailored toward supporting bumblebee species of conservation concern.